Momentum Newsletter: Spring 2026

This spring, progress is taking shape across every part of our work. From advancing research to expanding programs that reach more patients than ever before, we are helping hope bloom. Across labs, clinics, and communities, your support is driving meaningful momentum at a critical time for pancreatic cancer research.

UCLA Activity Report: Research in Action

The 2025 UCLA Activity Report highlights the strength of our partnership with the UCLA Agi Hirshberg Center for Pancreatic Diseases, where 52 active clinical trials are bringing innovative therapies directly to patients. Advances in adenosine-based immunotherapy, research into using immunotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery, and continued enrollment in a leading vaccine trial reflect a research model that balances discovery with care. The complete report is available to explore online, offering a deeper look at the progress your support is making possible.

Read the Complete Report →

20 Years of Impact: Annual Symposium on Pancreatic Cancer

This year marked the 20th Anniversary of our Annual Symposium, with a full audience and global virtual participation making it one of our most impactful yet. This year’s program covered critical topics from early detection to surgical innovation, emerging therapies to nutrition, and survivorship. The day offered a comprehensive view of current care and the progress being made. What began 20 years ago as a research centric gathering has evolved into a patient-centered day of connection, collaboration, and community. We celebrated this special milestone with a tribute to Agi for her vision and dedication to making this day possible.

Watch the Tribute Video

New Program Launch: PNET Pathway Grants

We are proud to launch the PNET Pathway Grant Program, expanding our research portfolio to include pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), a rare and underfunded disease. This initiative ensures more patients are represented in the future of research, accelerating progress in an area that urgently needs attention and investment. With a focus on PNET biology, early-stage disease progression predictors, advanced disease prognostication, and radiotherapy treatment, we aim to drive science into tangible results for patients and families.

Read more →

14th Annual Tour de Pier: Join Us for a Memorable Ride

The 14th annual Tour de Pier returns this spring, bringing together an inspiring community united by purpose and action. Set against the iconic Manhattan Beach Pier, this one-of-a-kind event features five signature ride experiences: Ride for a Cure, Ride for Fun, Ride for Hope, Ride for Family, and Ride for Love – each led by our beloved instructors and filled with celebrity appearances, moving stories, and tons of fun.

In advance of the event, our city-wide public art experience, The Art of the Ride, has been popping up at location across the South Bay. Five local artists have painted one-of-a-kind spin bikes that will be used on stage on May 17th. This is one day you don’t want to miss!

Register now →

Together, we can advance research, expand what’s possible for patients, and build momentum that reaches further each day. Every step forward is made possible by your continued belief in this work. Thank you for being part of the progress we are creating together.




Keeping Patients Moving Forward: CancerCare’s 2025 Year-End Impact

Since 1998, the Hirshberg Foundation has partnered with CancerCare to help families navigate the financial and emotional challenges that follow a pancreatic cancer diagnosis. With your generosity, we provide bi-annual grants that fund one-time financial assistance for low-income patients, alongside CancerCare’s free counseling, education, and case management. We are pleased to share year-end results and announce that our grant has been renewed for the first half of 2026.


Why Financial Support Is Critical at the Right Time

The cost of care for pancreatic cancer patients extends far beyond hospital bills. Even with insurance, patients face daily expenses that quickly become overwhelming: transportation to treatment, co-pays, home care, childcare, nutritional support, and basic household needs. For many families, these are not optional costs. They are the difference between continuing treatment or falling behind.

Research shows that individuals with lower incomes face significantly greater financial hardship, and patients with cancer are 71% more likely to experience serious financial strain within two years of diagnosis, sometimes forcing impossible choices between daily needs and staying on track with care.

Recent CancerCare Program data shows just how essential this support is. Between July and December 2025, 61 low-income pancreatic cancer patients received financial assistance, with nearly half of all grants covering co-pays, supporting basic transportation to treatment, home care, and critical imaging. These are not abstract expenses. They are the practical realities patients face every day. And for many, even a modest grant can mean the difference between missing an appointment and staying on track with care.


Real Lives, Real Impact

Behind every grant is a person navigating one of the most difficult experiences of their life. With your support, these patients are not facing it alone.

James, 70 — Connecticut

Living with Stage IV pancreatic cancer, James is undergoing chemotherapy and radiation while managing financial strain. With limited family support, he relies on his faith, church, and community. Assistance from CancerCare helped cover essential needs like food and transportation, while connecting him to additional resources that continue to support his care.

Denise, 65 — Illinois

Recently diagnosed and undergoing chemotherapy and wound care, Denise is balancing her treatment alongside other health challenges. With the support of her family, she continues to stay positive. A financial assistance grant helped cover the cost of an MRI, easing immediate financial pressure and allowing her to focus on her care.

Michael, 57 — Ohio

Undergoing immunotherapy and managing difficult side effects, Michael is also navigating emotional challenges and isolation. Financial assistance helped cover insurance premiums, allowing his family to redirect limited resources toward other essential needs.

David, 65 — Kentucky

Recently diagnosed and experiencing significant treatment side effects, David faces gaps in insurance coverage and rising household costs. Support from CancerCare helped cover treatment expenses and even basic needs like pet food, providing stability during a time of uncertainty.

*Names have been changed to protect confidentiality.


2025 Year-End Program Updates

The CancerCare program continues to reach patients across the country, providing meaningful support where it is needed most.The latest program data reinforces what we see every day: Insurance alone is often not enough. Financial toxicity is a real and growing challenge, and programs like this ensure that patients are not forced to navigate it alone.

During the second half of 2025:

Patients were supported in over 20 states, with the highest need in Texas, Florida, Illinois, and New Jersey.

63.9% of patients were between ages 41–64, with another 32.8% aged 65 and older.

Nearly 90% of patients had some form of insurance, yet still required financial assistance to manage out-of-pocket costs.


Looking Ahead: Continued Support, Lasting Impact

Thanks to the generosity of our donor community, the Hirshberg Foundation continues to fund this vital partnership with CancerCare, ensuring that patients facing pancreatic cancer have access to immediate, compassionate support when they need it most. If you would like to make this lifeline possible for more families, we invite you to donate today.

Support Patient Programs

If you or someone you love needs assistance, please contact CancerCare to learn about eligibility and available services.

Sources




Promising results combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery in pancreatic cancer

A recent study published in Nature Communications, sponsored by the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, showed that adding immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy, before surgery, may benefit a subset of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This clinical trial also used tumor tissue to investigate how the tumor environment responds to treatment. This allowed researchers to understand the trial results and generate new ideas feeding into future research. As senior author Dr. Timothy Donahue, Chief of the Division of Surgical Oncology and Professor of Surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, put it, “Establishing this platform within the Agi Hirshberg Center for Pancreatic Diseases positions us to evaluate multiple new therapeutics in a systematic and translationally integrated way in the future”.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common type of pancreatic cancer, remains a devastating diagnosis for almost all patients due to advanced disease at time of diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgery to remove the tumor can be curative but very few patients present with localized disease that qualify them for resection. A more recent advancement for advanced PDAC has been the adoption of a four-drug combination chemotherapy called FOLFIRINOX. This potent cocktail combines leucovorin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin and has increased survival for patients with advanced disease. For patients with tumors that are localized but sit near major blood vessels surgery is riskier and more complex. These patients are often treated first with chemotherapy to increase their chances for surgical resection, improving their long-term prognoses. In other types of cancer, such as lung cancer, adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy has allowed more patients to undergo surgery. Immunotherapy increases the activity of the patient’s immune system to fight their cancer. For PDAC, there hasn’t been an evaluation of FOLFIRINOX combined with immunotherapy in the pre-surgical setting. 

In this study, patients with borderline resectable PDAC were treated with a combination of FOLFIRINOX and nivolumab (an immunotherapy agent) prior to surgery to remove their tumors. Additionally, tumor tissue was evaluated after resection to understand the cellular changes caused by the immunotherapy and relate them to surgical outcomes. To evaluate the tumor tissue, researchers used several techniques that allowed them to evaluate gene and protein expression by cells and understand where different cell types (tumor cells vs immune cells) were located in the tumor (spatial transcriptomics). 

The team found that the addition of immunotherapy to FOLFIRINOX was safe, causing no additional side effects and no immune adverse events. While the percentage of patients able to receive surgery after the combo was increased, the overall effect of the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy was similar to earlier studies of FOLFIRINOX alone. However, there was a small number of patients who had exemplary and durable results; 2 patients who achieved complete disappearance of cancer and 2 patients who had a near complete disappearance of detectable cancer. Understanding why these four patients had such a strong response can help identify biomarkers for people who will respond to this treatment combination or similar immunotherapy approaches. Jason Link, PhD and associate professor of surgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, is a Catalyst Grant awardee whose work is focused on these rare patients demonstrate that, under certain conditions, the immune system can keep pancreatic cancer in check.

By analyzing tumor tissue after treatment and comparing it to pre-treatment biopsies, researchers were able to catalog changes caused by the combination of immunotherapy and FOLFIRINOX. This study found that in tumors treated with a combination of nivolumab and FOLFIRINOX there were disorganized clusters of immune cells present within the tumor. These clusters included antibody-secreting plasma cells and “exhausted” CD8+ T cells that have the capacity to recognize and kill tumor cells but are dysfunctional. These observations suggest that any immune system activation was ultimately suppressed and helps to explain the lack of additional clinical benefit to the immunotherapy and chemotherapy combination. They also allow researchers to understand how immune cells changes in pancreatic cancer differ from cancers that do respond to immunotherapy. 

“By testing this novel drug combination in the preoperative setting, we were able to directly compare pre-treatment biopsies with surgical resection specimens to better understand why the therapy works in some patients, and, just as importantly, why it does not in others, and what additional strategies might improve response,” said Dr. Donahue in a UCLA Health article

Immunotherapy has transformed outcomes in many cancers, but pancreatic cancer remains resistant. Studies like this are critical to understanding how to use immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes and identify sub-sets of patients that could benefit from immune-based treatments. By pairing clinical trials with in-depth translational study of the tumor’s cellular and molecular landscape, researchers are creating a roadmap for more precise, patient-specific treatments and developing next-generation therapies designed to overcome pancreatic cancer’s unique biology.




Hirshberg Foundation Launches PNET Pathway Grant Program to Accelerate Research

The Hirshberg Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research is proud to announce the launch of the PNET Pathway Grant Program, a new research initiative focused on accelerating discoveries in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

This targeted program will support high-impact scientific projects aimed at improving our understanding of PNET biology, predicting disease progression, and advancing innovative treatment strategies for patients.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a distinct type of pancreatic tumor that behave very differently from the more common pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While some PNETs remain stable for years and may only require monitoring, others progress and require more aggressive treatment. Because the biology of these tumors can vary significantly from patient to patient, physicians are often faced with difficult decisions about when treatment is necessary and when careful surveillance may be the best approach.

The PNET Pathway Grant Program was designed to help answer these critical questions by supporting research that can lead to earlier detection, more precise prognostic tools, and new therapeutic options.

The name “Pathway” reflects the biological signaling pathways that drive these tumors as well as the goal of creating a clear pathway from scientific discovery to improved patient care.


Applications Now Open

Applications for the inaugural PNET Pathway Grant Program cycle are now open, with a submission deadline of May 15, 2026. Eligible researchers are invited to submit proposals that address the program’s priority research areas.

Application Details →


As we continue to support the next generation of discoveries, we can expand the impact of pancreas cancer research. Thanks to the generosity of supporters, the Hirshberg Foundation continues to develop the scope of the research it can support, investing in promising ideas and the scientists who are pushing the field forward.

The launch of the PNET Pathway Grant Program represents an important step toward improving outcomes for all patients facing pancreatic tumors.

By supporting innovative research today, the Foundation is helping create new pathways toward better treatments and a brighter future for patients and families affected by pancreatic cancer.

Donate today towards the PNET Pathway Grant Program

Donate today →




pNET Treatments and Emerging Research

As an overview of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, we look at the current standard treatment for pNETs and what emerging therapies are on the horizon. Also discussed is the translational research needed to increase the success of current and emerging therapies.


How are pNETs treated and what emerging therapies are being explored?

For some small, low-grade, nonfunctioning pNETs with no evidence of metastasis, a conservative “watchful waiting” strategy may be adopted, involving regular monitoring in lieu of immediate surgery. In some cases, these tumors may never progress to become symptomatic or require intervention.

Surgery

pNETs are frequently localized, low-grade and slow-growing; therefore, surgery is the most common treatment, as complete removal of the tumor can be curative. The specific surgical approach depends on tumor size and location, and whether it is functional or nonfunctional. The goal of surgery is to remove all tumor tissue while preserving as much healthy normal pancreas tissue as possible. For larger or more complex tumors, partial or total removal of the pancreas may be necessary, which can result in the development of diabetes.

For slow growing functional pNETs, excess hormone production is often the main cause of symptoms. In these cases, rather than completely removing the tumor, a debulking procedure may be performed to eliminate enough tissue to reduce hormone production and reduce symptoms while avoiding total tumor removal.

Since surgery for pancreatic tumors (PDAC or pNET) can damage surrounding healthy tissue, it can leave patients with diabetes or deficiencies in pancreatic enzymes following the procedure. As a result, less invasive methods for tumor removal or destruction are being explored as alternative strategies for managing pNET. These include:

Endoscopic ultrasound guided Radiofrequency Ablation (EUS-RFA)

EUS guided probe generates high temperatures using radio waves and induces localized tissue injury, causing cell death.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided Ethanol Ablation (EUS-EA)

EUS guided needle injects an alcohol solution into the tumor to kill tumor cells.

Early studies, including a Hirshberg Foundation Seed Grant funded study utilizing EUS-RFA have shown success and low complication rates.

Therapies for Advanced or High-Grade pNETs

For low grade tumors that have spread to other organs or for high grade tumors, surgery is not an option. The following therapies are approved and commonly used for these patients.

Somatostatin Analogs (SSAs)

SSAs such as octreotide and lanreotide bind somatostatin receptors, inhibiting a key survival pathway.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT)

SSAs connected to radioactive compounds (177Lu-DOTATATE) to deliver radiation only to cells that express somatostatin receptors. An emerging type of radiotherapy, Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT) is being tested in clinical trials and may offer less off-target radiation effects thereby increasing safety.

Targeted Inhibitors

Drugs that block key signaling pathways that fuel tumor growth or survival. Approved therapies include everolimus (mTOR signaling), sunitinib (multiple pathways), and belxutifan (HIF-2ɑ signaling in VHL patients). Additional inhibitors targeting related or overlapping pathways are also being investigated in pNETs to better determine which pathways are most critical for tumor growth and to identify therapeutic combinations that may provide the most effective tumor control.

Chemotherapy

Used in patients with metastatic or high-grade tumors. Commonly used chemotherapies include streptozocin, 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, capecitabine, and temozolomide.

Combinations of these separate therapies are currently being tested in the clinic to find optimal treatment regimens that increase responses and survival without decreasing quality of life.


Emerging Therapy: Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)

A novel class of drugs that offer the potential to deliver chemotherapy selectively to tumor cells. ADCs use antibodies that recognize proteins specifically expressed on tumor cells to carry and release highly potent drugs directly at the tumor site, minimizing damage to healthy tissue.

These therapies have shown promising results in leukemias and lymphomas, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and lung cancer. A key factor in their success is the identification of tumor-specific surface proteins. One such protein, DLL3, is expressed on pNETs — early studies demonstrated clinical activity, although significant side effects were observed.

Additional ADCs targeting tumor-associated proteins are currently in development and clinical testing across several cancers, including PDACs and pNETs. Continued translational research is still needed to identify additional pNET-specific targets that could accelerate the development of this promising therapeutic approach.


The Importance of Translational Research

Translational studies that analyze patient samples before and after treatment are critical for identifying biomarkers of response and understanding the tumor characteristics that determine sensitivity to specific therapies. Insights from these studies will help clinicians design more personalized treatment strategies tailored to the unique features of each patient’s tumor.

Hirshberg Foundation pNET Pathways Grant Program

Through the Hirshberg Foundation pNET Pathways Grant Program, we aim to accelerate research toward new therapeutic options for pNETs, helping ensure that all individuals affected by pancreatic diseases have greater hope for improved outcomes in the future.




What is a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor?

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, also called pNETs or PanNETs, are the second most common type of pancreatic tumor, representing up to 2% of all pancreatic cancer cases. pNETs are distinct from the most common type of pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or PDAC) as they tend to be slower-growing, and have a generally better prognosis. Due, in part, to technical advances as well as more frequent imaging, the number of people being diagnosed with pNETs has been increasing. Here we will address what pNETs are, who is at risk for developing them, and how they are classified. In part 2, we will talk about the types of treatments commonly offered to patients as well as emerging techniques and areas where translational research is focusing.

Key pNET Statistics

According to the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) Program

New cases per year
4,300–4,400
Incidence rate
1.3 / 100,000
Average age at diagnosis
60.9 years

Five-Year Survival Rates

Total (all stages)

48%

Localized (no spread)

91%

Regional (adjacent lymph nodes)

64%

Distant (metastasis)

19%


What Are Neuroendocrine Tumors?

Neuroendocrine cells are specialized cells found in many organs. They function by receiving signals from the nervous system and respond by releasing hormones. When these cells acquire the capacity for uncontrolled cell growth, they give rise to neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). NETs are classified based on their site of origin, with the most common locations being the lungs and the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. Within the GEP organs, the pancreas is one of the most frequent sites, accounting for approximately 7% of all neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrine tumors can also arise in other organs, including the thyroid, skin, adrenal glands, and the pituitary gland.


What Are the Different Types of pNETs?

Neuroendocrine tumors are described as either functional or non-functional based on whether they secrete excess hormones.

Non-Functional pNETs

Non-functional pNETs are the most common subtype and are estimated to account for approximately 50–90% of all pNET cases. Unlike functional tumors, they do not secrete excess hormones and therefore typically produce fewer early clinical symptoms. When symptoms do occur — such as weight loss, jaundice, and abdominal pain — they often resemble those seen in PDAC and may go unnoticed or only become evident as the tumor grows or spreads. As a result, non-functional pNETs are frequently diagnosed at more advanced stages compared with functional pNETs.

Functional pNETs

Functional pNETs produce excess hormones and are classified into subtypes according to the specific hormone that they secrete. Because of this abnormal hormone production, functional pNETs often cause more pronounced symptoms or hormone-related syndromes, which can facilitate earlier detection and diagnosis. The most common types of functional pNETs are:

Scroll to see full table
Type of pNET Frequency* Hormone(s) Secreted Associated Conditions / Symptoms
Insulinoma 50–60% Insulin Low blood sugar and hypoglycemia
Gastrinoma 20–30% Gastrin Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: ulcers and diarrhea
Glucagonoma 5–10% Glucagon Severe rash (necrolytic migratory erythema), diabetes, weight loss, and anemia
VIPoma 3–5% Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) WDHA syndrome: watery diarrhea, low potassium, and reduced gastric acid
Somatostatinoma 5% Somatostatin Somatostatinoma syndrome: weight loss, pain, diabetes, gallstones, diarrhea, and fatty stool

*Frequency of functional pNETs. pNETs overproducing other hormones are rare and make up ~5% of functional pNETs.


Is There a High-Risk Group for pNET Development?

Most pNETs arise sporadically in people with no family history of neuroendocrine tumors. However, ~10% of pNET patients carry inherited genetic mutations that increase their risk of developing pNETs and other cancers. The two hereditary syndromes most strongly associated with pNET development are:

  • Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) — caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene. Approximately 30–80% of individuals will develop a pNET, most commonly a non-functioning tumor or an insulinoma.
  • Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Syndrome — caused by mutations in the VHL gene. Between 11–17% of patients develop pNETs, which are typically non-functioning, slow-growing, and have a relatively low risk of spreading.

Less commonly, pNETs can also occur in individuals with Tuberous Sclerosis (TSC), Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), and Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).


How Are pNETs Classified?

Neuroendocrine tumors are typically classified based on how much cell division is taking place within the tumor. At the time of diagnosis, more than 90% of pNETs are categorized as G1 (low grade) or G2 (intermediate grade), with over 60% of tumors classified as G1. Less than 10% of tumors are designated G3 (high grade).

G1
Low Grade
> 60% of cases

G2
Intermediate Grade
~30% of cases

G3
High Grade
< 10% of cases

G3 tumors are further classified according to how closely the tumor cells resemble normal neuroendocrine cells. Well-differentiated tumors, whose cells resemble typical neuroendocrine cells, are called neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). In contrast, tumors with cells that appear atypical or poorly resemble neuroendocrine cells are considered “poorly differentiated” and are classified as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). G3 pancreatic NECs (PanNECs) are generally more aggressive than pNETs and have a worse prognosis.

Spread at Diagnosis

Like other solid tumors, pNETs can be described based on whether they have spread from the pancreas:

~60% Localized — tumor is confined to the pancreas

~25% Regional — spread to nearby lymph nodes or surrounding tissues

~20% Distant — metastatic spread to distant organs

➡️

Coming in Part 2

We will discuss currently available treatment options as well as the evolving translational research landscape for emerging treatments.

Read Part 2 →